☆☆☆☆☆
簡體網頁||繁體網頁



點擊這裡下載

類似圖書 點擊查看全場最低價

---

編輯推薦

The theme is the way in which intellectual traditions are created and trans-mitted... Orientalism is the example Mr. Said uses, and by it he means something precise. The scholar who studies the Orient (and specifically the Muslim Orient), the imaginitive writer who takes it as his subject, and the institutions which have been concerned with teaching it, settling it, ruling it, all have a certain representation or idea of the Orient defined as being other than the Occident, mysterious, unchanging and ultimately inferior.

內容簡介

The noted critic and a Palestinian now teaching at Columbia University,examines the way in which the West observes the Arabs.

作者簡介

Said was an influential cultural critic and author, known best for his book Orientalism (1978), which catapulted him to international academic fame. The book presented his influential ideas on Orientalism, the Western study of Eastern cultures. Said contended that Orientalist scholarship was and continues to be inextricably tied to the imperialist societies that produced it, making much of the work inherently politicized, servile to power, and therefore suspect.

Grounding much of this thesis in his intimate knowledge of colonial literature such as the fiction of Conrad, and in the post-structuralist theory of Foucault, Derrida and others, Said's Orientalism and following works proved influential in literary theory and criticism, and continue to influence several other fields in the humanities. Orientalism affected Middle Eastern studies in particular, transforming the way practitioners of the discipline describe and examine the Middle East. Said came to discuss and vigorously debate the issue of Orientalism with scholars in the fields of history and area studies, many of whom disagreed with his thesis, including most famously Bernard Lewis.

精彩書評

"The theme is the way in which intellectual traditions are created and trans-mitted... Orientalism is the example Mr. Said uses, and by it he means something precise. The scholar who studies the Orient (and specifically the Muslim Orient), the imaginitive writer who takes it as his subject, and the institutions which have been concerned with teaching it, settling it, ruling it, all have a certain representation or idea of the Orient defined as being other than the Occident, mysterious, unchanging and ultimately inferior."
--Albert Hourani, New York Review of Books

Orientalism 英文原版 [平裝] 下載 mobi epub pdf txt 電子書

評分☆☆☆☆☆

紙比較輕薄，攜帶方便，這本書讀過中文的，買本原著迴來拜讀拜讀

評分☆☆☆☆☆

2. 異域（）：關注他者具有吸引力的一麵（如閨房、麵紗、藝妓等，東方女性被描繪成為放蕩、被動且頗具異域風情）。

評分☆☆☆☆☆

挑釁性學術作品

評分☆☆☆☆☆

近古以前歐洲人所說的東方主義中的東方，指亞洲等地，包括歐洲人所指的近東、中東、遠東地區，甚至包括俄羅斯和原來的東羅馬帝國。中國稱東方文化圈則指以中國為代錶的東亞文化圈。而在當代英語中，東方（Oriental）一詞狹義上也主要指以中國為代錶的東亞文化地區，不包括印度、西亞等地區，比以前所指的範圍小。

評分☆☆☆☆☆

　　

評分☆☆☆☆☆

編輯本段特點持偏見態度的人被認為是時常有意無意地抱著十八、十九世紀的歐洲帝國主義態度來理解東方世界，又或對東方文化及人文的舊式及帶有偏見的理解。東方主義的描述性錶達無一例外地將地中海以東各國傢社會的多種生活進行瞭對象化、本質化和刻闆印象的方式處理。對立化的錶現有：

評分☆☆☆☆☆

很好，很好用，質量不錯哦

評分☆☆☆☆☆

挑釁性學術作品

評分☆☆☆☆☆

薩義德於1978年在他富有爭議的名著《東方學》裏清晰錶達並宣揚瞭這個觀點，以伊斯蘭研究為中心分析歐洲的東方學，有學者總結薩義德的觀點如下：“薩義德曾以伊斯蘭研究為中心分析過歐洲的東方學，他把這種學問視為一種根據東方在歐洲西方經驗中的位置而處理、協調東方的方式，在這種方式中，東方成為瞭歐洲物質文明和文化的內在組成部分，是歐洲自我得以建立的它者。對於歐洲而言，東方既不是歐洲的純粹虛構或奇想，也不是一種自然的存在，而是一種被人為創造齣來的理論和實踐體係，蘊含著漫長曆史積纍下來的物質層麵的內容。”批評這種學術傳統以及一些現代學者，例如普林斯頓大學的Bernard Lewis教授，和文明衝突論學者，耶魯大學教授亨廷頓博士。

類似圖書 點擊查看全場最低價