George Anders is a contributing writer at Forbes, exploring issues related to careers, education and innovation. He is the author of five books, including Merchants of Debt, Health Against Wealth, the New York Times bestseller Perfect Enough, and The Rare Find. Earlier in his career, George served as a staff writer for The Wall Street Journal, Fast Company magazine and Bloomberg View. In 1997, he shared in a Pulitzer Prize for national reporting. He and his wife live in northern California. Their two sons are starting their own college adventures.
There are no underground bunkers of supercomputers at the heart of the Uber miracle. No cloisters of silent technicians guiding Etsy to its marketplace dominance. Google HQ looks more like a Scandinavian parliament than a server farm. The truth is, the tech boom has less to do with a massive explosion of silicon and aluminum, and much more to do with a massive expansion of the points of contact between humans and machines.
George Anders's YOU CAN DO ANYTHING is shaped by the insight that the leading lights at so many ostensibly "tech" firms have deep backgrounds in the humanities--history, sociology, and, yes, English. Something about those backgrounds unlocked potential that hordes of anonymous MBAs and BSs can only wish for.
Combining reportage, academic studies, close contact with tech and business luminaries, fast action-oriented distillations, and many years of experience reading the invisible magnetic waves of the business and creator worlds, Anders is writing the book that will upset (cf: "disrupt") the conversation between the STEM and the innumerate, between Mountain View and Main Street, and between parents and children. We all have the power to think on our feet, to rally others, and to embrace the exception. We just need to realize the power. YOU CAN DO ANYTHING points us in that direction and shoves.
##還可以,你跟我說理科是固定記憶,演講和寫作是純文科,這我有點沒有辦法接受啊… … 你覺得論文,講座這種背背就行瞭嗎~~~~~
評分美國文科生培養目標:通過大量閱讀和思考,形成批判性思維,社交能力強情商在綫,審美在綫。我國:死記硬背,鑽研語法………
評分##到底是liberal education還是STEM教育法有用估計是未來教育學爭論最多的方麵,當然大可以各打五十大闆全部非常有用 解決復雜問題,是這個時代最重要的能力。文科生比較強。 無用的自由技藝力量驚人。 在當下社會中,文科生正變得越來越重要。—這個世界正在變得越來越復雜,復雜的問題沒有單一的答案,隻能在復雜關係中不斷的調整,然後找到最閤適的方嚮。—文科思維更有優勢。 固定技藝:解決...
評分##屠龍技能與日常工作結閤起來(知識就是力量) 機會網絡 Talking point(逆境,影響力,技術水平,閤拍,成就)
評分##文科生的雞湯,但是書中提到的特例依然是少數,你放到理科生中,依然會有很多具備這種能力的人,這種能力我個人認為很大部分是天生的。
評分##讀藝術史真能培養洞察力?讀小說能理解每個人想要的是什麼?不是在騙人吧。
評分##得到聽書: 本書告訴瞭我們一個這個世界正在發生的變化。現實正在悄然變化,現在的事實是文科生更有優勢。原因很簡單,文科思維訓練的是一種“自由技藝”,學會的是如何用復雜的眼光來看待這個世界。而理科思維則是訓練一種“固定技藝”,隻解決具體的問題。而在這個社會足夠細分的時代裏,解決復雜問題的能力,比解決單一問題的能力要重要得多。而“批判性思維”是“自由技藝”和解決復雜問題的關鍵。 不過,在解決復雜問題方麵文科比理科有優勢。你可以是文科生懂點技術,也可以是個工科生懂點自由技藝。那麼究竟應該學文科還是學理科 一,每個人應該選擇自己喜愛的專業去學 二,為瞭獲得更好的社會適應性,最好有一點跨界的知識 三,你得至少在一個領域有比一般人高很多的水平纔行。或在兩個領域同時達到前25%
評分##Liberal Arts萬歲..但是這類型的書有個通病 - 列舉無數例子關於有文科背景可以做多麼多麼endless的工作,但是這些都是牛人故事...普適性不太強哇。想想那些牛逼同學,理科學得好,文科其實學的更好..
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.coffeedeals.club All Rights Reserved. 靜流書站 版權所有