具體描述
On the eve of International Women’s Day in 2015, the Chinese government arrested five feminist activists and jailed them for thirty-seven days. The Feminist Five became a global cause célèbre, with Hillary Clinton speaking out on their behalf and activists inundating social media with #FreetheFive messages. But the Five are only symbols of a much larger feminist movement of civil rights lawyers, labor activists, performance artists, and online warriors prompting an unprecedented awakening among China’s educated, urban women. In Betraying Big Brother, journalist and scholar Leta Hong Fincher argues that the popular, broad-based movement poses the greatest challenge to China’s authoritarian regime today.
Through interviews with the Feminist Five and other leading Chinese activists, Hong Fincher illuminates both the difficulties they face and their “joy of betraying Big Brother,” as one of the Feminist Five wrote of the defiance she felt during her detention. Tracing the rise of a new feminist consciousness now finding expression through the #MeToo movement, and describing how the Communist regime has suppressed the history of its own feminist struggles, Betraying Big Brother is a story of how the movement against patriarchy could reconfigure China and the world.
用戶評價
##某些單方麵決定以評價學術專著的標準來雞蛋裏挑骨頭的用戶，實際上是無事找茬，暴露瞭基於立場和偏見而非基於事實和公正的馬腳
評分##火車上看完，權當是記錄，也理當被記錄
評分作者的觀點是：父權是極權統治的重要手段，麵對現在全世界的極權傾嚮，支持女權是最有效的應對手段。說實話一開始我是懷疑態度。也許作者研究女權所以把它看得過於重要？xxx肯定沒有把女性看得重要到要當作重要打擊對象吧？以對抗極權為目的呼籲大傢支持女權是不是騙人的？但是看完書我被完全說服瞭。如果你和我一樣對現在的新聞感到驚訝和睏惑（殺妻輕判；傢暴不立案；重新鼓吹男尊女卑三從四德這些以前被說是封建落後的東西；人口危機鼓勵生育卻仍然不允許單身女性生育；發反行騷擾貼紙的人要抓起來……等等），那麼不要懷疑瞭，解釋隻有一個：比起生育什麼的，更重要的是父權，因為那是極權的基石。另外書裏還從曆史的角度揭示瞭從國民黨到xxx，女權都是被利用的。男革命傢不太可能真的同情女權。奪取權力的時候利用女權，分配權利時輪不到女性
評分##這是一本值得讀一讀的書，感謝這位作者的發聲
評分##說是中國女權主義的覺醒，然而通篇講來講去就是五姐妹。敘事翻來覆去，重復囉嗦，個人感情色彩太濃，有損閱讀體驗，章節之間關係不強，理論論證站不住腳，精衛填海和鞦瑾的故事聯係太牽強，數據來源也模模糊糊。除瞭五姐妹的采訪，和人民日報的幾篇文章，作者似乎沒有任何其他個人貢獻瞭。
評分##非常極其一般。可以肯定的是記錄瞭近幾年年輕一代特彆是五姐妹的運動細節。但是到瞭介紹曆史背景深入論述的部分，基本就是大型文獻綜述，語言讀起來非常不順，作者自己的知識貢獻很有限
評分##2.5/5 Fincher would benefit if she bothered to hire a few editors for advice, because her writing appears tediously dry and repetitive, often without delving deeper into the 'history side' of the issue, not to mention that the feminism discussed in this book seems somewhat naive and strategically flawed in excluding men from the conversation.
評分##這是一本值得讀一讀的書，感謝這位作者的發聲
評分作者的觀點是：父權是極權統治的重要手段，麵對現在全世界的極權傾嚮，支持女權是最有效的應對手段。說實話一開始我是懷疑態度。也許作者研究女權所以把它看得過於重要？xxx肯定沒有把女性看得重要到要當作重要打擊對象吧？以對抗極權為目的呼籲大傢支持女權是不是騙人的？但是看完書我被完全說服瞭。如果你和我一樣對現在的新聞感到驚訝和睏惑（殺妻輕判；傢暴不立案；重新鼓吹男尊女卑三從四德這些以前被說是封建落後的東西；人口危機鼓勵生育卻仍然不允許單身女性生育；發反行騷擾貼紙的人要抓起來……等等），那麼不要懷疑瞭，解釋隻有一個：比起生育什麼的，更重要的是父權，因為那是極權的基石。另外書裏還從曆史的角度揭示瞭從國民黨到xxx，女權都是被利用的。男革命傢不太可能真的同情女權。奪取權力的時候利用女權，分配權利時輪不到女性
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.coffeedeals.club All Rights Reserved. 靜流書站 版權所有