 
			 
				What are the consequences if the people given control over our government have no idea how it works?
"The election happened," remembers Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, then deputy secretary of the Department of Energy. "And then there was radio silence." Across all departments, similar stories were playing out: Trump appointees were few and far between; those that did show up were shockingly uninformed about the functions of their new workplace. Some even threw away the briefing books that had been prepared for them.
Michael Lewis’s brilliant narrative takes us into the engine rooms of a government under attack by its own leaders. In Agriculture the funding of vital programs like food stamps and school lunches is being slashed. The Commerce Department may not have enough staff to conduct the 2020 Census properly. Over at Energy, where international nuclear risk is managed, it’s not clear there will be enough inspectors to track and locate black market uranium before terrorists do.
Willful ignorance plays a role in these looming disasters. If your ambition is to maximize short-term gains without regard to the long-term cost, you are better off not knowing those costs. If you want to preserve your personal immunity to the hard problems, it’s better never to really understand those problems. There is upside to ignorance, and downside to knowledge. Knowledge makes life messier. It makes it a bit more difficult for a person who wishes to shrink the world to a worldview.
If there are dangerous fools in this book, there are also heroes, unsung, of course. They are the linchpins of the system―those public servants whose knowledge, dedication, and proactivity keep the machinery running. Michael Lewis finds them, and he asks them what keeps them up at night.
##每一個risk的基本闡述邏輯是:**精英在某個部門做齣瞭傑齣貢獻,某個部門對於整個美國的社會經濟發展不可或缺,而Trump團隊卻對此不夠重視。。。
評分##19#09 終於等到瞭Michael Lewis的新書,但是讀起來遠沒有之前的作品有意思,第三章的最後一個故事我更是在抱娃睡覺的睏倦中忍無可忍地索性跳過瞭。這一方麵是題材的問題:本作講的不是金融圈的光怪陸離,而是(在黑川普的底色下)講述瞭美國政治係統的成就、問題和隱憂。另一方麵,本作與前作之前的差異也是立場上的:無論是Liar's Poker, The Big Short還是Flash Boys,Lewis都是站在“全球性正確”的立場(中小投資者保護是其中重要的一點)上針砭金融界公認的弊端,嬉笑怒罵暢快淋灕;但本作立場局限於美國國內政治中的一派,是非麯直外人既無共鳴,又難判斷。盡管如此,讀後確實對美國政府一些部門的具體工作有瞭更深的認識。
評分##打書釘,又一斷斷續續三四個月的長徵 Write the impact of Trump's on the U.S. government. At first glance it seems that nothing wrong.Each of his policies has far-reaching effects & at the same time weakens of the USA.The author's so-called the fifth risk refers to the mismanagement of government programs.Take the entire USA into very dangerous & uncharted territory
評分##Program management.
評分##Program management.
評分##簡明扼要的從democratic establishment的角度闡述瞭三個問題:管核武器靠科學,美國農村要遭殃因為淳樸的USDA都不喜歡Trump people,颶風路綫很隨機預測天氣還得靠衛星但是大數據還是nb
評分##語音書到手,罵川普的,也就這本值得一讀。雖然有流水賬之嫌,不過,作者呈現的黯淡現實真讓理想主義者寒心。嫌內容少的讀者有些吹毛求疵,川普去年初就職,作者在一年多時間完成采訪撰寫,寫瞭三個主要部門的問題,已經很不易瞭。為敘述風格加一星,顯然為瞭中期選舉匆忙完成的。錶麵上反對川普,實際批判這種造就川普的政治環境和那些無視或無知於政府職能的選民們。即使共和黨失去多數地位,風險長期存在,美國的政治氣氛和意識形態纔是問題癥結所在,川普隻是開始。
評分##感覺,寫跟金融不相關的的有點看不下去…當然題材還是不錯的,我們不知道的風險纔是最緻命的,
評分##有點散的流水賬,中心思想不過是it's the risks that we fail to imagine that get us killed,扯上特朗普豈不是格局小瞭?
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.coffeedeals.club All Rights Reserved. 靜流書站 版權所有