发表于2024-12-14
[正版二手] 英美法案例精选丛书(英文版):美国知识产权法(第2版) pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载
基本信息
书名:英美法案例精选丛书(英文版):美国知识产权法(第2版)
定价:38.00元
作者:陈剑玲
出版社:对外经济贸易大学出版社
出版日期:2012-09-01
ISBN:9787566304582
字数:
页码:317
版次:2
装帧:平装
开本:32开
商品重量:0.4kg
编辑推荐
内容提要
《英美法案例精选丛书(英文版):美国知识产权法(第2版)》是对外经济贸易大学法学院国家重点学科建设项目英美法案例精选丛书(英文版)中的一辑,选录了美国版权法、法、商标法三个领域中的一些经典案例,旨在通过研究原汁原味的案例,介绍美国知识产权法框架体系中的一些基本原则。由于篇幅所限,《英美法案例精选丛书(英文版):美国知识产权法(第2版)》难以对三大部门法中的相关经典案例作一个非常全面的介绍,因此,《英美法案例精选丛书(英文版):美国知识产权法(第2版)》的重点主要是在版权法上。读者在阅读案例时,可以跟随美国法官的思路,理解其如何在综合考虑多方因素的基础上,尽量维护多种利益的平衡,并得出终的判决。案例后面附有思考题,以帮助读者更快地理解每个案件的焦点问题。
目录
编 美国版权法
章 版权保护的条件
节 表达和思想观念
案例1 Baker V.Selden
案例2 Nichols V.Universal Pictures Corporation
案例3 Morrissey V.Procter&Gamlble;
第二节 作品的原创性
案例4 Feist V.Rural
案例5 GraceV.Bradford Exchange.
第三节 作品的固定
案例6 White Smith Music Pub Co.v.Appollo Co
案例7 National Football League v.McBee & Bruno's,Inc
第四节 版权标记
案例8 Hasbro Bradley,Inc.V.Sparkle Toys,Inc
第五节 版权保护的消极条件
案例9 Mitchell Bros.v.Cinema Adult Theater
第二章 作品的类型
节 一般形式
案例10 Andrew Leicester V.Warner Brothers
第二节 特殊形式
案例11 GRicordi&Co.v.Paramount; Pictures,Inc
案例12 New York Times Co.v.Tasini
第三章 版权的保护期限
案例13 Eric Eldred v.JohD.Ashcroft
第四章 版权的内容
节 作者的权利
案例14 Columbia Pictures Industries v. Redd Horne
案例15 Quality Kmg Distributors,lnc.v. L'Anza Research Int'l,Inc
第二节 合理使用
案例16 Harper&Row; Publishers V.NatioEnterprises
案例17 Campbell v.Acuff-Rose Music Inc
第五章 版权的侵权和救济
节 侵权
案例18 Sony Co.v.Universal City Studios, Inc
案例19 Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc.v.Grokster,Ltd
第二节 救济
案例20 Feltner v.Columbia Pictures Television,Inc
案例21 Boissov.BaniliaInc
第六章 版权法和其他知识产权法的关联
节 版权和
案例22 MaZer v.Stein
第二节 版权和商标
案例23 Dastar Corp.v.Twentieth Century Foxfilm Corp
第七章 和计算机软件有关的版权问题
节 保护的范围
案例24 ComputerAssociates International,lnc.,V.Altai,Inc.
第二节 保护的限制
案例25 Sega Enterprises Ltd.v.Assolade,lnc.
第八章 版权滥用及其规则
案例26 Laserb America v.Reynolds
案例27 Practice ManagementlnformatioCorp.v.AMA
第二编 美国法
第三编 美国商标法
作者介绍
文摘
2) Substantial Similarity Test for Computer Program Structure: Abstraction-Filtration-Comparison
We think that Whelan's approach to separating idea from expressioiputer programs relies too heavily ometaphysical distinctions and does not place enough emphasis opractical considerations. Cf. Apple Computer,714 F.2d at 1253 (rejecting certaimercial constraints oprogramming as a helpful means of distinguishing idea from expressiobecause they did 'not enter into the somewhat metaphysical issue of whether particular ideas and expressions have merged'). As the cases that we shall discuss demonstrate, a satisfactory answer to this problem cannot be reached by resorting, a priori, to philosophical first principals.
As discussed herein, we think that district courts would be well-advised to undertake a three-step procedure, based othe abstractions test utilized by the district court, iorder to determine whether the non-literal elements-of two or more puter programs are substantially similar. This approach breaks no new ground; rather, it draws osuch familiar copyright doctrines as merger, scenes a faire, and public domain. Itaking this approach, however, we are cognizant that puter technology is a dynamic field which caquickly outpace judicial decisiomaking. Thus, icases where the technology inquest odoes not allow for a literal applicatioof the procedure we outline below, our opinioshould not be read to foreclose the district courts of our circuit from utilizing a modified version,
Iascertaining substantial similarity under this approach, a court would first break dowthe allegedly infringed program into its constituent structural parts. Then, by examining each of these parts for such things as incorporated ideas, expressiothat is necessarily incidental to those ideas, and elements that are takefrom the public domain, a court would thebe able to sift out all non-protectable material. Left with a kernel, or possible kernels, of creative expressioafter following this process of elimination, the court's last step would be to pare this material with the structure of aallegedly infringing program. The result of this parisowill determine whether the protectable elements of the programs at issue are substantially similar so as to warrant a finding of infringement. It will be helpful to elaborate a bit further.
Step One: Abstraction
As the district court appreciated, see Computer Assocs.,775 F. Supp.at560, the theoretic framework for analyzing substantial similarity expounded by Learned Hand ithe Nichols case is helpful ithe present context. INichols, we enunciated what has now bee knowas the 'abstractions' test for separating idea from expression:
Upoany work...a great number of patterns of increasing generality will fit equally well, as more and more of the incident is left out. The last may perhaps be no more thathe most general statement of what the isabout, and at times might consist only of its title; but there is a point ithis series of abstractions where they are no longer protected, since otherwise the could prevent the use of his 'ideas,' to which, apart from their expression, his property is never extended.
While the abstractions test was originally applied irelatioto literary works such as novels and plays, it is adaptable to puter programs. Icontrast to the Whelaapproach, the abstractions test 'implicitly recognizes that any givework may consist of a mixture of numerous ideas and expressions.'
……
序言
编 美国版权法
章 版权保护的条件
节 表达和思想观念
案例1 Baker V.Selden
案例2 Nichols V.Universal Pictures Corporation
案例3 Morrissey V.Procter&Gamlble;
第二节 作品的原创性
案例4 Feist V.Rural
案例5 GraceV.Bradford Exchange.
第三节 作品的固定
案例6 White Smith Music Pub Co.v.Appollo Co
案例7 National Football League v.McBee & Bruno's,Inc
第四节 版权标记
案例8 Hasbro Bradley,Inc.V.Sparkle Toys,Inc
第五节 版权保护的消极条件
案例9 Mitchell Bros.v.Cinema Adult Theater
第二章 作品的类型
节 一般形式
案例10 Andrew Leicester V.Warner Brothers
第二节 特殊形式
案例11 GRicordi&Co.v.Paramount; Pictures,Inc
案例12 New York Times Co.v.Tasini
第三章 版权的保护期限
案例13 Eric Eldred v.JohD.Ashcroft
第四章 版权的内容
节 作者的权利
案例14 Columbia Pictures Industries v. Redd Horne
案例15 Quality Kmg Distributors,lnc.v. L'Anza Research Int'l,Inc
第二节 合理使用
案例16 Harper&Row; Publishers V.NatioEnterprises
案例17 Campbell v.Acuff-Rose Music Inc
第五章 版权的侵权和救济
节 侵权
案例18 Sony Co.v.Universal City Studios, Inc
案例19 Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc.v.Grokster,Ltd
第二节 救济
案例20 Feltner v.Columbia Pictures Television,Inc
案例21 Boissov.BaniliaInc
第六章 版权法和其他知识产权法的关联
节 版权和
案例22 MaZer v.Stein
第二节 版权和商标
案例23 Dastar Corp.v.Twentieth Century Foxfilm Corp
第七章 和计算机软件有关的版权问题
节 保护的范围
案例24 ComputerAssociates International,lnc.,V.Altai,Inc.
第二节 保护的限制
案例25 Sega Enterprises Ltd.v.Assolade,lnc.
第八章 版权滥用及其规则
案例26 Laserb America v.Reynolds
案例27 Practice ManagementlnformatioCorp.v.AMA
第二编 美国法
第三编 美国商标法
[正版二手] 英美法案例精选丛书(英文版):美国知识产权法(第2版) pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载