The New York Times bestselling author of The Origins of Political Order offers a provocative examination of modern identity politics: its origins, its effects, and what it means for domestic and international affairs of state
In 2014, Francis Fukuyama wrote that American institutions were in decay, as the state was progressively captured by powerful interest groups. Two years later, his predictions were borne out by the rise to power of a series of political outsiders whose economic nationalism and authoritarian tendencies threatened to destabilize the entire international order. These populist nationalists seek direct charismatic connection to “the people,” who are usually defined in narrow identity terms that offer an irresistible call to an in-group and exclude large parts of the population as a whole.
Demand for recognition of one’s identity is a master concept that unifies much of what is going on in world politics today. The universal recognition on which liberal democracy is based has been increasingly challenged by narrower forms of recognition based on nation, religion, sect, race, ethnicity, or gender, which have resulted in anti-immigrant populism, the upsurge of politicized Islam, the fractious “identity liberalism” of college campuses, and the emergence of white nationalism. Populist nationalism, said to be rooted in economic motivation, actually springs from the demand for recognition and therefore cannot simply be satisfied by economic means. The demand for identity cannot be transcended; we must begin to shape identity in a way that supports rather than undermines democracy.
Identity is an urgent and necessary book―a sharp warning that unless we forge a universal understanding of human dignity, we will doom ourselves to continuing conflict.
##一度在好像有点道理和皱眉之间横跳,更多的时候就纯粹是一种索然无味 也许是政治学的stroke对读惯了更nuanced的人类学的taste来说有点太粗了 言必从gj,可行性层面谈论问题,感觉在听西方zf内部辩论 读完这个想去读点graeber缓缓,可行不一定可行,但it feels right. ---------------(分割线) 看完reversing roe滚回来加星????♀️ 残酷的世道面前有什么理想主义可言 dystopia里面讨论什么utopia 每个人都能有块遮羞布地活下去就不错了
评分##号召大家捍卫自由民主核心价值观,克服身份政治的分裂破坏性影响....一颗拳拳爱国之心啊....和马克里拉的思路很像。很喜欢福山的流畅文笔,希望明天有机会要到签名...
评分从福山个人思想脉络看,是回应美国政治现实之作,也延续了历史终结与政治秩序的分析框架,只是为之补充了心理学(精神分析)的论证;他认为市场与文化领域中的冲突取代了政治上的斗争,但显然近年来这一趋势发生了逆转,福山试图重新锚定自己的论断。从议题本身而言,福山采纳了泰勒《本真性伦理》的基本框架与观点,将身份政治界定为寻求尊严的斗争(科耶夫与黑格尔),内含自我本真的产生、寻求承认的渴望以及承认的民主化、普遍化。以此讨论了个人主义与宗教、民族主义的伴生共存的根源,身份政治引发的社会冲突(种族、宗教、性别、恐怖主义与移民议题以及无名者的悲惨状态),集中分析了身份政治在民族认同、国家身份构建中的意义及美国与欧洲的现实之道。
评分##还可以,主要还是涉及民族身份认同,其他一笔掠过。讲身份认同的溯源和演变还有thymos蛮有意思的。讲到的ethnolinguistics和身份认同引起些相关思考。
评分##为探讨身份政治(Identity Politics),福山梳理从柏拉图 、卢梭、康德、黑格尔、尼采等(思想史),梳理西方社会的历史沿袭(社会史)。福山对identity做了灵魂-心理分析和政治学双重意义上阐释性定义,身份政治是黑格尔意义上人类历史驱动的产物,在西方完成民主化之后因为贫富分化、移民、难民等问题产生的新社会运动。身份政治有两个层面,一者是个体层面为获得尊严(dignity)而争取外部社会对其真实自我的认同,反对社会压制,一者是群体层面(如民族、同性恋、性少数)为获得群体性承认的运动。除了学理分析,福山对2010s的全球政治保持高度关注,其个人视野的政治描述和分析,能够帮助分析当下的国际社会新状况,在书末开出的“药方”(针对中国、欧盟等)可做进一步探讨
评分##用“身份政治”来解释HK废青暴动,倒是很贴切。
评分##fukuyama 近作。以dignity/ identity 的角度出发讨论了世界最近发生的问题- 左翼力量的下降/女权运动/伊斯兰极端主义/民粹民族主义/individualism等等。广却不深。可以作为知识积累的一本书,通俗好读,案例丰富 ,可以安利做闲暇阅读。
评分##虽然作者一直在强调identify 和 recognition的重要性和独立性,但是还是隐隐的感觉全球化带来的财富分化和欧洲的经济停滞才是identity politics 发生的根本原因。但是确实正如作者讲得,身份政治具有经济根源,但是一旦被激活其本身就像堡垒一样变得非常坚固,人们脑子里筑起的墙很难再被推倒。 但是作者的药方还是有点苍白啊......
评分##一度在好像有点道理和皱眉之间横跳,更多的时候就纯粹是一种索然无味 也许是政治学的stroke对读惯了更nuanced的人类学的taste来说有点太粗了 言必从gj,可行性层面谈论问题,感觉在听西方zf内部辩论 读完这个想去读点graeber缓缓,可行不一定可行,但it feels right. ---------------(分割线) 看完reversing roe滚回来加星????♀️ 残酷的世道面前有什么理想主义可言 dystopia里面讨论什么utopia 每个人都能有块遮羞布地活下去就不错了
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.coffeedeals.club All Rights Reserved. 静流书站 版权所有