☆☆☆☆☆
簡體網頁||繁體網頁



點擊這裡下載

類似圖書 點擊查看全場最低價

---

編輯推薦

v 特，然而恰恰是他，寫齣瞭中西方學界公認的公正、客觀、全麵的哲學史，其架構、論述類彆、視角都獨樹一幟。

v 書籍經典：哲學史上第一部以講義為基礎、以史傢宏觀視角編寫的哲學著作。影響深遠。是學習哲學的人士案頭必備工具書，與羅素的西哲史並駕齊驅，為哲學界之雙璧。

v 譯文優秀：本書為北京大學哲學博士賈辰陽和解本遠二位專傢聯袂翻譯打造，曆時多年，殫精竭慮，譯文考究，再三錘煉，摒棄舊式哲學類書晦澀艱深超過原文的通病，通俗，易懂，精準，同類書籍，無齣其右。

內容簡介

本書為中英雙語兩本，以硬裝盒裝形式呈現。它是一部講述西方哲學發展曆程的著作，其雛形為梯利教授在大學任教時的講義。此次齣版，共有中英文兩本。具體分為希臘哲學、中世紀哲學、近代哲學三編。往下又劃分為自然哲學、知識和行為問題、重建時期、倫理運動、宗教運動、基督教和中世紀哲學的古典來源、經院哲學的形成期、文藝復興時期的哲學、英國經驗主義的開端、歐洲大陸的唯理論、啓濛運動哲學、康德的批判哲學、德國的唯心主義、黑格爾之後的德國哲學、法國和英國的哲學、法對理性主義和唯心主義等二十篇。篇下設章，講述更為具體。文後附原書索引，便於讀者檢索細目。中文字數接近七十萬，是一部規模宏大的哲學史著作。此次中英文兩冊一起齣版，規模浩大，齣版方特意延請業內的兩位哲學博士共同翻譯打造校準，力求讓此選題更加精準、完善，讓更多學人、哲學愛好者，一起瞭解並傳播西方哲學。

作者簡介

弗蘭剋·梯利（Frank Thilly，1865—1934），美國著名哲學傢和哲學史傢，曾先後在密蘇裏州立大學、普林斯頓大學、康乃爾大學教授哲學和心理學，並於1915年至1921年間擔任康奈爾大學文學院院長。著作有《西方哲學史》《倫理學導論》等。

目錄

Introduction
PART ONE. GREEK PHILOSOPHY
Ⅰ. Philosophy of Nature
1. ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF EARLY GREEK THOUCHT.
History of Greek Philosophy —— Environment—— Politics—— Literature —— Religious Origins of Greek Philosophy—— Survey of Greek Philosophy
2. DEVELOPMENT OF PRE-SOPHISTIC PHILOSOPHY
3. THE PROBLEM OF SUBSTANCE
Thales —— Anaximander —— Anaximenes —— Pythagorasand His School
4. THE PROBLEM OF CHANGE
Permanence and Change —— Heraclitus —— The EleaticSchool
5. QUALITATIVE THEORIES
Solution of the Riddle of Change —— Empedocles ——Anaxagoras
6. QUANTITATIVE THEORIES
The Atomism of Democritus —— Metaphysics and Cosmology—— Psychology and Theory of Knowledge—— Theology and Ethics
Ⅱ. Problems of Knowledge and Conduct
7. THE AGE OF THE SOPHISTS
Progress of Thought —— Greek Enlightenment —— The Sophists
8. SOCRATES AND THE SOCRATIC SCHOOLS
The Socratic Problem —— The Socratic Method —— The Socratic Ethics —— The Socratic Schools
Ⅲ. The Age of Reconstruction
9. PLATO
Plato and His Problem —— Dialectic and Theory of Knowledge —— Hierarchy of the Sciences —— Doctrine of Ideas —— Philosophy of Nature —— Cosmology —— Psychology —— Doctrine of Immortality —— Ethics —— Politics ——Plato's Historical Position- The Platonic School
10. ARISTOTLE
Aristotle's Problems —— Philosophy and the Sciences ——Logic —— Metaphysics —— The Four Causes —— Theology—— Physics —— Biology —— Psychology —— Ethics —— Politics —— Aristotle's Genius and Influence —— Post-Aristotelian Philosophy
Ⅳ. The Ethical Movement
11. THE OUTLOOK
12. EPICUREANISM
The Problem —— Logic and Epistemology —— Meta——physics —— Psychology —— Ethics —— Social and Political Philosophy
13. STOICISM
Zeno and His School —— Logic and Theory of Knowl-edge —— Metaphysics —— Cosmology —— Psychology ——Ethics —— Politics —— Religion —— Resume of Greek Ethics
14. SKEPTICISM AND ECLECTICISM
The Skeptical School —— Doctrines of the School ——Later Skeptics —— Eclecticism
Ⅴ. The Religious Movement
15. JEWISH-GREEK PHILOSOPHY
Philosophy and Religion —— Beginnings of Jewish-Greek Philosophy —— Philo
16. NEOPLATONISM
Pythagorean Sources of Neoplatonism —— Neoplatonism—— Plotinus —— Later Neoplatonism —— Closing of the School at Athens

PART TWO. MEDIEVAL PHILOSOPHY
Ⅵ. Christian and Classical Sources of Medieval Philosophy
Ⅶ. The Formative Period of Scholasticism
Ⅷ. The Period of Maturity： The Thirteenth Century
Ⅸ. Period of Decline： After the Thirteenth Century

PART THREE. MODERN PHILOSOPHY
Ⅹ. Philosophy of the Renaissance
Ⅺ. The Beginnings of British Empiricism
Ⅻ. Continental Rationalism
ⅩⅢ. The Development of British Empiricism
ⅩⅣ. The Development of Rationalism in Germany
ⅩⅤ The Philosophy of the Enlightenment
ⅩⅥ. The Critical Philosophy of Immanuel Kant
ⅩⅦ. German Idealism
ⅩⅧ. German Philosophy after Hegel
ⅩⅨ. Philosophy in France and England
ⅩⅩ. Reaction against Rationalism and Idealism
Index

精彩書摘

Preface to the Revised Edition

THE FIRST edition of the late Professor Thilly’s A History ol Philosophy appeared over thirty-five years ago. Few books in the fields of philosophy or history have maintained undiminished popularity as texts and usefulness as reference works over so long a period. The remarkable vitality of Professor Thilly’s work may be traced to its original conception and execution.

Perhaps the outstanding characteristic of Professor Thilly’s approach to the history of philosophy was the objectivity and impartiality of his historical attitude, which escaped the distorting effect of a dogmatic interpretation of historical development. Professor Thilly allowed the philosophers to speak for themselves and, in the conviction that the later systems in the history of philosophy provide the criticism of earlier schools, kept his own criticism to a minimum.

Professor Thilly’s own two major philosophical commitments were to idealism and rationalism, but he did not allow his own philosophical biases to obtrude in his account of the historical figures with whom he dealt. Indeed, if anything, he was frequently more successful in the presentation of historical theories with which he was in disagreement than of those with which he was in sympathy. His idealism was not of the dogmatic Hegelian variety, but was closer to the critical idealism of Kant. Professor Thilly considered mind an indubitable fact whose existence was guaranteed by introspective experience. His idealism was, however, not a subjectivism which denied the external world or reduced it to the status of mere appearance, and his rationalism insisted that experience, or nature, has rational structure and coherence which render it intelligible to man’s rational mind. His was not a dogmatic rationalism of the Cartesian variety which posits innate, self-evident truths, but rather a critical rationalism, which considers the basic truths of mathematics and the underlying assumptions of science and philosophy to be indispensable presuppositions of an intelligible world.

A second feature of the book which explains its sustained success is the sense of proportion displayed in the presentation of thinkers in their place in philosophical movements. Without adopting an Hegelian dialectic of the history of philosophy, Thilly discerned an inner logic in historical development. Individual thinkers were integrated to movements, and the movements in their turn formed parts of a larger historical pattern. His recognition of the inner logic of the historical process did not, however, prevent his giving due recognition to the social, political, cultural, and personal or temperamental factors which influence individual philosophers. Thilly’s assimilation of philosophers to movements was particularly skillful in his organization of the modern period. Bacon and Hobbes were grouped together as two relatively independent figures who, while not properly part of the British empiricism of Locke, Berkeley, and Hume, prepared the way for it. Descartes and Spinoza were considered together as the founders of continental rationalism, and Leibniz, instead of being included, as was customary, as the third in the triumvirate of rationalists, was introduced after British empiricism as a philosopher of the enlightenment.

A third feature was the clarity and simplicity of Professor Thilly’s style. In discussing with me the composition of his history Professor Thilly told me that the book grew out of a study of the history of philosophy written with no intention of publication, but solely for the purpose of clarifying his own understanding of the historical philosophers and their relations to one another. This clarification which Thilly achieved for himself pervades the entire exposition.

Professor Thilly’s interest in the history of philosophy was not that of the historical antiquarian who seeks merely to record the achievements of the past, nor was it primarily that of the historian of ideas who merely traces the continuous history of ideas and conceptions. It was that of the philosopher who seeks philosophical illumination in the history of his subject. He thought of the history of philosophy as a repository of philosophical ideas from which the philosopher draws his materials and his insights. He rejected the study of the history of philosophy merely for its own sake, but at the same time deplored the pseudo-originality of those who are ignorant of the philosophical achievements of the past. The study of the history of philosophy, he said in his introduction, “serves as a useful preparation to philosophical speculation, passing, as it does, from the simpler to the more complex and difficult constructions of thought... The man who tries to construct a system of philosophy in absolute independence of the work of his predecessors cannot hope to rise very far beyond the crude theories of the beginn 西方哲學史（英文版） 下載 mobi epub pdf txt 電子書

評分☆☆☆☆☆

評分☆☆☆☆☆

評分☆☆☆☆☆

評分☆☆☆☆☆

評分☆☆☆☆☆

評分☆☆☆☆☆

評分☆☆☆☆☆

評分☆☆☆☆☆

評分☆☆☆☆☆

類似圖書 點擊查看全場最低價