社會契約論(全英文原版) [The Social Contract]

社會契約論(全英文原版) [The Social Contract] pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載 2025

[法] 讓-雅剋·盧梭 著,G.D.H.Cole 譯
圖書標籤:
  • Political Philosophy
  • Social Contract
  • Rousseau
  • Enlightenment
  • Political Theory
  • Philosophy
  • Classic
  • Government
  • Liberty
  • Citizenship
想要找書就要到 靜流書站
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁
你會得到大驚喜!!
齣版社: 四川人民齣版社
ISBN:9787220102363
版次:1
商品編碼:12191997
包裝:平裝
叢書名: 英文原版 社科經典
外文名稱:The Social Contract
開本:32
齣版時間:2017-09-01
用紙:輕型紙
頁數:144
字數:170000
正文語種:英文

具體描述

産品特色


內容簡介

西方政治思想史中用契約關係解釋社會和國傢起源的政治哲學理論。它通過把社會和國傢看作人們之間訂立契約的結果,來說明政治權wei、政治權利和政治義務的來源、範圍和條件等問題。它探討的是政治權利的原理,它的主旨是為人民民主主權的建立奠定理論基礎。它的問世,是時代的需要,是人類社會嚮前進步的産物;它正確迴答瞭曆史進程提齣的問題:法國命運的航船駛嚮何方。


古人有雲:朝聞道,夕死可矣。人是社會動物,都有窺探社會組織架構、瞭解社會組織形態的好奇心和衝動。而現代社會更多脫胎於始於歐洲的資産階級革命,要想做這方麵的探究,和偉人直接對話是一條捷徑。這就是這套原版的社科經典叢書的編輯初衷。不管你是學哲學的學生,還是從事社會科學研究的學者,不讀幾部經典原著,不在書架上擺上一套經典原著,應該是人生的一大憾事。

作者簡介

盧梭(Jean-Jacques Rousseau)18世紀法國啓濛思想傢、哲學傢、教育傢、文學傢、音樂傢,法國大革命的思想先驅,啓濛運動卓越的代錶人物之一,被譽為“現代民主政體之父”。盧梭堅持社會契約論,主張建立資産階級的“理性王國”;強調自由平等,反對壓迫;提齣“天賦人權”,反對專製、暴政。其代錶作有:《論人類不平等的起源和基礎》《社會契約論》《愛彌兒》《懺悔錄》等。

目錄

The Introduction 001

PART 1 OF MAN 004

PART 2 OF COMMON-WEALTH 149

A REVIEW, AND CONCLUSION 329


精彩書摘

Leviathan: of man and common-wealth

By Thomas Hobbes,1651

THE INTRODUCTION

Nature (the art whereby God hath made and governes the world) is by the art of man, as in many other things, so in this also imitated, that it can make an Artificial Animal. For seeing life is but a motion of Limbs, the begining whereof is in some principall part within; why may we not say, that all Automata (Engines that move themselves by springs and wheeles as doth a watch) have an artificiall life? For what is the Heart, but a Spring; and the Nerves, but so many Strings; and the Joynts, but so many Wheeles, giving motion to the whole Body, such as was intended by the Artificer? Art goes yet further, imitating that Rationall and most excellent worke of Nature, Man. For by Art is created that great LEVIATHAN called a COMMON-WEALTH, or STATE, (in latine CIVITAS) which is but an Artificiall Man; though of greater stature and strength than the Naturall, for whose protection and defence it was intended; and in which, the Soveraignty is an Artificiall Soul, as giving life and motion to the whole body; The Magistrates, and other Officers of Judicature and Execution, artificiall Joynts; Reward and Punishment (by which fastned to the seat of the Soveraignty, every joynt and member is moved to performe his duty) are the Nerves, that do the same in the Body Naturall; The Wealth and Riches of all the particular members, are the Strength; Salus Populi (the Peoples Safety) its Businesse; Counsellors, by whom all things needfull for it to know, are suggested unto it, are the Memory; Equity and Lawes, an artificiall Reason and Will; Concord, Health; Sedition, Sicknesse; and Civill War, Death. Lastly, the Pacts and Covenants, by which the parts of this Body Politique were at first made, set together, and united, resemble that Fiat, or the Let Us Make Man, pronounced by God in the Creation.

To describe the Nature of this Artificiall man, I will consider

First the Matter thereof, and the Artificer; both which is Man.

Secondly, How, and by what Covenants it is made; what are the Rights and just Power or Authority of a Soveraigne; and what it is that Preserveth and Dissolveth it.

Thirdly, what is a Christian Common-Wealth.

Lastly, what is the Kingdome of Darkness.

Concerning the first, there is a saying much usurped of late, That Wisedome is acquired, not by reading of Books, but of Men. Consequently whereunto, those persons, that for the most part can give no other proof of being wise, take great delight to shew what they think they have read in men, by uncharitable censures of one another behind their backs. But there is another saying not of late understood, by which they might learn truly to read one another, if they would take the pains; and that is, Nosce Teipsum, Read Thy Self: which was not meant, as it is now used, to countenance, either the barbarous state of men in power, towards their inferiors; or to encourage men of low degree, to a sawcie behaviour towards their betters; But to teach us, that for the similitude of the thoughts, and Passions of one man, to the thoughts, and Passions of another, whosoever looketh into himselfe, and considereth what he doth, when he does Think, Opine, Reason, Hope, Feare, &c;, and upon what grounds; he shall thereby read and know, what are the thoughts, and Passions of all other men, upon the like occasions. I say the similitude of Passions, which are the same in all men, Desire, Feare, Hope, &c; not the similitude or The Objects of the Passions, which are the things Desired, Feared, Hoped, &c;: for these the constitution individuall, and particular education do so vary, and they are so easie to be kept from our knowledge, that the characters of mans heart, blotted and confounded as they are, with dissembling, lying, counterfeiting, and erroneous doctrines, are legible onely to him that searcheth hearts. And though by mens actions wee do discover their designee sometimes; yet to do it without comparing them with our own, and distinguishing all circumstances, by which the case may come to be altered, is to decypher without a key, and be for the most part deceived, by too much trust, or by too much diffidence; as he that reads, is himselfe a good or evill man.

But let one man read another by his actions never so perfectly, it serves him onely with his acquaintance, which are but few. He that is to govern a whole Nation, must read in himselfe, not this, or that particular man; but Man-kind; which though it be hard to do, harder than to learn any Language, or Science; yet, when I shall have set down my own reading orderly, and perspicuously, the pains left another, will be onely to consider, if he also find not the same in himselfe. For this kind of Doctrine, admitteth no other Demonstration.

PART 1. OF MAN.

CHAPTER I. OF SENSE

Concerning the Thoughts of man, I will consider them first Singly, and afterwards in Trayne, or dependance upon one another. Singly, they are every one a Representation or Apparence, of some quality, or other Accident of a body without us; which is commonly called an Object. Which Object worketh on the Eyes, Eares, and other parts of mans body; and by diversity of working, produceth diversity of Apparences.

The Originall of them all, is that which we call Sense; (For there is no conception in a mans mind, which hath not at first, totally, or by parts, been begotten upon the organs of Sense.) The rest are derived from that originall.

To know the naturall cause of Sense, is not very necessary to the business now in hand; and I have els-where written of the same at large. Nevertheless, to fill each part of my present method, I will briefly deliver the same in this place.

The cause of Sense, is the Externall Body, or Object, which presseth the organ proper to each Sense, either immediatly, as in the Tast and Touch; or mediately, as in Seeing, Hearing, and Smelling: which pressure, by the mediation of Nerves, and other strings, and membranes of the body, continued inwards to the Brain, and Heart, causeth there a resistance, or counter-pressure, or endeavour of the heart, to deliver it self: which endeavour because Outward, seemeth to be some matter without. And this Seeming, or Fancy, is that which men call sense; and consisteth, as to the Eye, in a Light, or Colour Figured; To the Eare, in a Sound; To the Nostrill, in an Odour; To the Tongue and Palat, in a Savour; and to the rest of the body, in Heat, Cold, Hardnesse, Softnesse, and such other qualities, as we discern by Feeling. All which qualities called Sensible, are in the object that causeth them, but so many several motions of the matter, by which it presseth our organs diversly. Neither in us that are pressed, are they anything els, but divers motions; (for motion, produceth nothing but motion.) But their apparence to us is Fancy, the same waking, that dreaming. And as pressing, rubbing, or striking the Eye, makes us fancy a light; and pressing the Eare, produceth a dinne; so do the bodies also we see, or hear, produce the same by their strong, though unobserved action, For if those Colours, and Sounds, were in the Bodies, or Objects that cause them, they could not bee severed from them, as by glasses, and in Ecchoes by reflection, wee see they are; where we know the thing we see, is in one place; the apparence, in another. And though at some certain distance, the reall, and very object seem invested with the fancy it begets in us; Yet still the object is one thing, the image or fancy is another. So that Sense in all cases, is nothing els but originall fancy, caused (as I have said) by the pressure, that is, by the motion, of externall things upon our Eyes, Eares, and other organs thereunto ordained.

But the Philosophy-schooles, through all the Universities of Christendome, grounded upon certain Texts of Aristotle, teach another doctrine; and say, For the cause of Vision, that the thing seen, sendeth forth on every side a Visible Species(in English) a Visible Shew, Apparition, or Aspect, or a Being Seen; the receiving whereof into the Eye, is Seeing. And for the cause of Hearing, that the thing heard, sendeth forth an Audible Species, that is, an Audible Aspect, or Audible Being Seen; which entring at the Eare, maketh Hearing. Nay for the cause of Understanding also, they say the thing Understood sendeth forth Intelligible Species, that is, an Intelligible Being Seen; which comming into the Understanding, makes us Understand. I say not this, as disapproving the use of Universities: but because I am to speak hereafter of their office in a Common-wealth, I must let you see on all occasions by the way, what things would be amended in them; amongst which the frequency of insignificant Speech is one.



《國傢理性之思:權力、自由與秩序的韆年迴響》 一部跨越時空的政治哲學史詩,深入剖析人類社會構建的基石與睏境。 本書並非對任何單一、特定文本的解讀或重述,而是一部宏大而精密的政治思想史地圖集。它緻力於描繪自柏拉圖以降,人類對於“正當治理”的永恒追問中所形成的知識譜係。我們將聚焦於那些驅動文明演進、塑造國傢形態的核心概念——權力(Potestas)、閤法性(Legitimacy)、主權(Sovereignty)以及個人在群體中的位置。 第一部分:古典的奠基與神權的陰影(The Classical Foundations and the Shadow of the Divine) 本章從古希臘城邦的理想模型切入,探討亞裏士多德對“政治動物”的界定,以及公民參與的早期形態。我們細緻考察瞭城邦政治的內在張力:多數人的統治與少數人的智慧如何共存,以及正義(Dikaiosyne)在實際操作中如何被扭麯。 隨後,筆鋒轉嚮羅馬共和國的實踐經驗,分析其混閤政體的精妙設計,以及“共和精神”(Virtus)在維護國傢穩定中的關鍵作用。然而,隨著帝國的擴張,個體自由的邊界開始模糊,權力日益集中於一人之手。 緊接著,我們深入探討中世紀思想的支配性力量。在此漫長的歲月中,政治權威的閤法性幾乎完全被神學所主導。本書詳盡分析瞭奧古斯丁對“上帝之城”與“塵世之城”的區分,它如何為後世的政教關係埋下瞭深刻的伏筆。我們還考察瞭托馬斯·阿奎那對亞裏士多德哲學的基督教化重構,探究自然法(Lex Naturalis)如何在神聖律法之下,為世俗統治者提供瞭一絲有限的製約。在這個階段,人民的意願被徹底邊緣化,政治權力被視為神聖的委托,而非社會成員的授予。 第二部分:文藝復興的覺醒與權力的現實主義(The Renaissance Awakening and the Realism of Power) 文藝復興的曙光帶來瞭對古典人文主義的重新發現,以及對人類自身能動性的肯定。政治思想開始從神學的高塔中走下,直麵世俗權力的殘酷本質。 本章將馬基雅維利的《君主論》置於其曆史背景下進行審視。我們不將其簡單地視為“惡”的宣言,而是理解為對當時意大利城邦間殘酷競爭的冷靜診斷。重點在於分析其“效果論”——成功治理由此被確立為衡量政治行動的首要標準。我們探討瞭“美德”(Virtù)在這一新語境下的含義轉變,它不再是道德上的純粹,而是政治上的高效和果斷。 同時,我們對比瞭尼科洛·馬基雅維利對君主製的論述與他未被充分重視的《論李維》,後者展現瞭他對共和製度在抵禦腐敗和維護持久自由方麵的深刻洞見。這種思想上的二元性,揭示瞭早期現代政治思想傢在理想與現實間的掙紮。 第三部分:主權的確立與絕對主義的堡壘(The Establishment of Sovereignty and the Fortress of Absolutism) 隨著民族國傢的興起,解決長期睏擾歐洲的宗教戰爭和內亂成為當務之急。政治理論開始係統性地構建“主權”這一核心概念,用以解釋國傢權力的最高性和排他性。 博丹(Jean Bodin)對主權不可分割性的早期界定,為後來的絕對主義奠定瞭理論基礎。而霍布斯(Thomas Hobbes)的巨著,則將這一理論推嚮瞭邏輯上的極緻。我們將深度解析霍布斯的“自然狀態”——一個充滿猜忌和暴力的前政治境況——如何必然地導緻個體讓渡幾乎所有權利給一個擁有絕對強製力的“利維坦”(Leviathan)。此處的關鍵在於理解,對安全與秩序的極度渴望,如何壓倒瞭對個體自由的追求,從而催生瞭我們所知的現代國傢機器的雛形。 第四部分:天賦人權與有限政府的抗爭(Natural Rights and the Struggle for Limited Government) 洛剋(John Locke)的思想標誌著對絕對主義的有力反擊。本書詳細闡述瞭洛剋如何將自然狀態的概念重塑為一個享有不可剝奪的“自然權利”(生命、自由和財産)的領域。政府的齣現,在洛剋看來,不再是源於對恐懼的逃避,而是為瞭更有效地保護這些先在的權利。 我們細緻對比瞭洛剋關於“信托”(Trust)的理論與霍布斯的“讓渡”(Alienation)。洛剋的政府是被委托的代理人,一旦背棄信托,人民便擁有閤法的反抗權。本章同時考察瞭早期啓濛思想傢在北美和英格蘭激發的政治實踐,這些思想是如何轉化為限製君主權力、建立代議製的具體憲政框架的。 第五部分:理性、意誌與“公共好”(Reason, Will, and the Public Good) 啓濛運動的高潮帶來瞭對普遍理性和人類潛能的樂觀信念,但也催生瞭對集體行動與個體異化的深刻反思。 盧梭(Jean-Jacques Rousseau)的理論構成瞭對前述所有權理論的又一次重大修正。我們區分瞭他對“自然人”的贊美與他對“文明社會”腐蝕性的批判。重點在於解析“公意”(Volonté Générale)的復雜內涵:它並非簡單的多數人意誌,而是一種指嚮公共利益的理性聚閤體。書中探討瞭這一概念的內在悖論——如何確保個體服從公意時,仍然保持其作為自由人的狀態,以及它在後世被不同政治運動所采納和誤用的曆史軌跡。 此外,本部分還將引入孟德斯鳩(Montesquieu)對權力製衡的開創性研究,分析其如何將“三權分立”提升為一種超越地理和文化限製的、維護自由的政治工程學原理。 結論:不確定的遺産與未來的審視 本書的收尾並非提供一個終極答案,而是總結政治思想史的核心矛盾:自由與秩序的永恒張力、精英統治與人民主權的內在衝突,以及人類在追求完美製度過程中不斷遭遇的局限性。我們最終會提齣一係列未解的問題,引導讀者去審視當代政治現象背後的曆史根源,理解我們今天所依賴的每一項政治安排,都凝聚著數韆年思想傢在理性與激情、理想與現實之間反復拉鋸的智慧結晶。

用戶評價

評分

這本書給我帶來瞭一種奇特的“清醒感”,仿佛作者是一位行走在曆史長河中的冷眼旁觀者,記錄著人類在群體生活中所犯下的結構性錯誤。它不是在歌頌進步,而是在冷靜地揭示那些被曆史慣性所掩蓋的內在矛盾。讀到某些段落時,我甚至感覺自己被一種強大的智力結構所籠罩,那些看似天經地義的社會約定,在作者的筆下,瞬間變得脆弱不堪。這種震撼,不在於觀點的顛覆性,而在於其論證的徹底性。它迫使你審視自己接受的那些“常識”,並問自己:這些常識的根基究竟在哪裏?那種對“自然狀態”的不斷迴溯和重估,讓人産生一種對當下現實的疏離感,這是一種健康的距離,也是一種必要的批判姿態。對於任何對“秩序”本身抱有深刻懷疑的人來說,這本書都是一次難得的精神洗禮。

評分

羅素的這本著作,盡管篇幅不算宏大,卻像一把手術刀,精準地剖開瞭現代政治哲學的諸多假象。閱讀它,就像是跟隨一位經驗老到的辯論傢,穿行於邏輯的迷宮之中。他並沒有試圖構建一個烏托邦式的完美社會模型,而是以一種近乎冷峻的理性,審視瞭權力、自由與道德之間的永恒張力。我尤其欣賞他那種不帶感情色彩的分析,將社會規範和製度的形成,還原為一係列可被檢驗、可被質疑的初始假設。那種層層遞進、環環相扣的論證方式,逼迫讀者跳齣日常的政治情感,從更基礎的層麵去思考“我們為什麼服從”以及“我們服從的邊界在哪裏”。整本書充滿瞭對清晰界限的執著,這一點在信息爆炸、界限日益模糊的當下,顯得尤為珍貴。它不是一本讀完就能讓人拍案叫絕的暢銷書,更像是一塊磨刀石,讓思考變得更加鋒利。

評分

如果說許多政治理論傢是在描繪宏偉的藍圖,那麼這位作者則更像是一位精密的工程師,專注於分析承重結構中的應力點。他的語言風格是如此剋製,幾乎不使用任何煽情的詞匯,然而正是這種不動聲色的嚴謹,構建起瞭一種無可辯駁的說服力。我發現自己不得不放慢速度,反復咀嚼那些定義和前提,因為任何一個微小的疏忽都可能導緻整個論證鏈條的斷裂。這種閱讀體驗是高度智力化的,它要求的不隻是理解,更是參與到作者構建的邏輯迷宮中去。對我而言,它更像是一套關於如何進行嚴格思考的範本,教會我如何剝離修飾,直達核心的假設。那些關於個體與整體關係的探討,至今仍在我腦海中迴響,提醒我警惕任何試圖將個體意誌完全吞噬的集體敘事。

評分

這本書最令人著迷之處,在於它成功地將抽象的哲學思辨,錨定在瞭人類最基本的生存睏境上。它沒有沉溺於對理想國的美好想象,而是聚焦於“我們如何纔能相對不那麼痛苦地生活在一起”這一永恒的難題。作者對權力本質的洞察,犀利得近乎殘酷,他揭示瞭維護秩序所需的代價,以及這種代價是如何通過一套精心設計的儀式和話語體係被閤理化的。我喜歡這種揭秘的過程,就像拆解一颱復雜的機器,看清每一個齒輪是如何咬閤,又是如何相互製約的。讀完後,我對新聞裏那些高談闊論的政治傢們少瞭一份盲目的崇拜,多瞭一份審慎的懷疑。這套理論框架,即便放到今天來看,依然是剖析當下社會紛爭的有力工具,因為它直指人性的幽暗與社會的結構性脆弱。

評分

我的感受是,這本書提供瞭一種“反馴化”的思維工具。在充斥著簡單答案和快速結論的時代,它像一股清流,倡導一種對既有觀念進行持續“去神聖化”的努力。作者的筆觸極其精準,很少有模棱兩可之處,這使得讀者必須作齣清晰的選擇,要麼接受其推論,要麼從邏輯上找到反駁的支點。這並非一本輕鬆的讀物,它需要讀者投入時間去梳理那些看似枯燥的邏輯推導,但一旦跨過最初的門檻,收獲的是對社會建構過程的深刻理解。它教會我,任何所謂的“自然秩序”都不過是曆史偶然性與權力博弈的産物。這種洞悉事物本質的能力,遠比記住任何具體的政治口號要寶貴得多。

評分

非常不錯的教材。很值得一看。

評分

558755662445633225655

評分

紙張不錯,印刷的也好,慢慢看,對自己也是鍛煉。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。

評分

給力,書都很不錯,物流很快,現在都比較喜歡在京東上買書

評分

京東配送非常快速

評分

紙張不錯,印刷的也好,慢慢看,對自己也是鍛煉。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。

評分

京東配送非常快速

評分

紙張不錯,印刷的也好,慢慢看,對自己也是鍛煉。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。

評分

傳而不習,不成。還得給腦子找個事乾,練練它。

相關圖書

本站所有內容均為互聯網搜尋引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度google,bing,sogou

© 2025 book.coffeedeals.club All Rights Reserved. 靜流書站 版權所有